VideoNuze Posts

In the spirit of the season, I'd like to offer a huge THANKS to VideoNuze's outstanding sponsors. Below they are listed along with their own descriptions:

Akamai - Akamai is the leading global service provider for accelerating content and applications online. click here for more

ExtendMedia - ExtendMedia provides software and media services that enable content providers and distributors to quickly and securely create, deliver, manage and monetize online content offerings over many devices. click here for more

thePlatform - thePlatform, a subsidiary of Comcast, is the leading broadband video ASP for content providers, broadband media sites, and mobile businesses. click here for more

Voxant - Voxant is building a new kind of network that delivers unparalleled licensed content, advertising and services to millions of web sites and niche communities throughout the Web. click here for more

Atlas Venture - Atlas Venture is an international early-stage venture capital firm that invests in communications, information technology and life sciences companies. click here for more

Brightcove - Brightcove is an Internet TV service that empowers video producers and programmers to build broadband businesses while giving viewers more choices and control over their use of video and television. click here for more

Digitalsmiths - Digitalsmiths is the company behind VideoSense, the first universally compatible and future-proof broadband video contextual ad-matching system. click here for more

ICTV - ICTV provides the technology and distribution network that enables television programmers and Web publishers to deliver broadband video and other media to television in an engaging, immersive TV-quality viewing experience. click here for more

PermissionTV - PermissionTV offers a flexible platform for delivering innovative and interactive video experiences on the Web. PermissionTV tools empower companies to use video to capture new audience, enhance relationships and maximize customer value. click here for more

Please take a moment to check them out!

A piece in Variety yesterday describing WBITD's aggressive new strategy to mine on-demand opportunities in cable, satellite and broadband underscores how technology is driving new distribution options and revenue opportunities, while at the same time posing new challenges to traditional business models.

 The article, entitled "WB Shows Go On-Demand" outlines how WBITD is launching "Warner TV" branded on-demand initiatives in Europe and Asia. That Warner will be offering its library of films and TV programs Warner entirely on-demand is a clear acknowledgement that consumer behavior has shifted beyond the "appointment viewing" paradigm of linear TV.

This shift, along with scarce channel capacity and resistant service providers, have all contributed to the fact that launching new cable networks here in the U.S has all but dried up. The recently unveiled Fox Business Channel is a huge exception; behind the scenes there are scores of people who aspired to launch their own cable networks who have now shifted their focus to on-demand, or increasingly to broadband.

Jeffrey Schlesinger, WBITD's president put his finger on why the on-demand and broadband models make so much sense, "The costs here are much lower than creating a linear channel. You don't have as much on-air promotion that you have to do. You don't have as much scheduling or advertising sales infrastructure. You don't have to worry about commercial insertion."

Building a new programming franchise today is more about nimbleness and experimentation than big structure and deliberative scheduling. WBITD seems to recognize this and also seems to be willing to test lots of different models depending on the opportunities and circumstances it encounters in each local market.

Of course the key balancing act for WBITD here is pursuing these new initiatives without disrupting existing revenue streams and relationships. That's the first thing I hear from all content providers who have a vested interest in existing models, but a hunger for new revenues. WBITD is sensitive to this: its plan is to offer library titles or a secondary window on current programming,

Add WBITD to your "watch list" of companies pioneering how distribution will work in the broadband era.

-Will Richmond

Does TV programming beget broadband video programming or is it the other way around?

If you were expecting a simple answer, recent evidence suggests that none will be forthcoming. Step away from the relatively straightforward model of streamed or downloaded TV episodes, and the question of how original video content will be produced and distributed between broadband and TV is whole lot more complicated. Layer on the writers' strike and the world only fogs up further.

For those who see broadband as a pathway to TV, Quarterlife's deal announced last Friday with NBC to bring their new Quarterlife series to the network following its run on MySpace offers encouragement that Internet programming can move to the TV (bear in mind that Quarterlife was originally pitched as a TV series however).

Another example is TMZ.com, which has been successfully syndicated as TMZ TV this fall by Warner Bros. TMZ shows us that a brand that was created and built solely online can make the leap to TV. And just last week TV Week reported that Twentieth Television and Yahoo were close to a deal to create a new syndicated series based on popular broadband videos that they've collected.

On the flip side, there is plenty of evidence of opportunities for TV programs spinning off broadband programming, or existing TV producers with assets and skills pushing into broadband as a first outlet for their work.

Consider Sony's Minisode Network, with distribution on MySpace, Joost, AOL and Crackle. In an effort to squeeze more life out of its library of classics, in June Sony launched abbreviated versions, for broadband "snacking". This initiative is being closely watched as a model for how to repurpose existing assets to make them more palatable for attention-challenged online audiences.

And Endemol's recent deal with Bebo to produce "The Gap Year" series for exclusively for Bebo's audience shows that a successful TV producer is turning its sites on broadband as a first outlet.

All of these deals underscore broadband's disruptive nature - its ability to create new opportunities for incumbent players, and also for new entrants. My read is that most (though not all) broadband producers would love to make the leap to the TV. In the mean time, broadband offers a low-cost, interactive distribution path to experiment with more engaged audiences.

Red Lasso is a stealthy company that's been around for about 2 years, though only now coming up to the surface. I did a phone briefing earlier this week with Kevin O'Kane, President/founder and Al McGowan, COO. They also gave me access to the private beta and I've been playing around with it for the last couple of days.

Red Lasso's goal is "to help broadcasters extend the life of their content, legitimately." They're positioning themselves as "an anti-YouTube", allowing broadcasters to proactively contribute long form video and audio, which users can then search and clip for exactly the content they're looking for. The video can simply be watched or it can be embedded. Though they don't want to be seen as an "online DVR", it is tempting to see them as such. Monetization is most likely through advertising, though a licensing model is possible as well.

Red Lasso's playing in the same basic space as Voxant (note: a VideoNuze sponsor) and Clip Syndicate (see this for more), with a key differentiator being the long form content availability and clipping feature. Red Lasso is currently taking 150 different broadcast feeds from around the country, and their ability to get the industry to cooperate is helped by the fact that Al and Kevin are broadcast veterans.

Red Lasso is trying to appeal to at least 3 types of users: broadcasters seeking to flexibly publish specific video clips on their own sites, independent web sites trying to feature key segments of their own video (e.g. sports teams) and bloggers seeking to embed video. They believe this third group is the most fertile territory and I agree.

Bloggers across the spectrum (politics, entertainment, sports, etc.) have been hungry for video clips to enhance their sites. I believe this demand will only increase. If you're a blogger looking just for the "money quote", clipping from long form assets provides a lot of value. I did some searching and clipping (below is one result).

I found the clipping pretty straightforward, and I liked the fact that I could save mine, which I can also publish to the community for widespread viral use if I choose to. The searching is based on phonetic and closed caption text. It was not quite as accurate as I hoped, but video search is a very tough nut to crack, and so I'd expect room for improvement there.

At a strategic level, Red Lasso again demonstrates how broadband's influence is going to be felt in the broadcast TV industry. I think traditional concepts of appointment viewing, geographic constraints and local ad sales are all going to seem quaint as broadband allows quality video to fly around the net. I'd urge broadcasters to be looking closely at all the players in this space.

Yesterday I received the below email from Movielink promoting a "Steal of a Deal" offer with Target. Here's how it works: I purchase an Ocean's Thirteen DVD at a Target store and I receive a code that then entitles me to download Ocean's Thirteen from Movielink.

Maybe I'm missing something (and please let me know if I am), but this promotion makes no sense to me and instead seems to possibly undermine the value of the Movielink service.

As with all marketing and promotional efforts, the starting point must always be "What's our objective?" So what is Movielink's objective here?

To expose people to the Movielink brand and service? That wouldn't make sense since I only received the email because I was on their email list in the first place.

To demonstrate there's consumer appetite for downloading the same that was just bought on DVD? That seems like a silly and sort of pointless thing to prove in the first place if you believe the ultimate opportunity for digital downloads is to be a DVD substitute, not a compliment.

To expose people to the breadth of Movielink's service? That's worthy, but the offer is limited to downloading the same title that was purchased, so the user isn't incented to browse and see the full breadth of the Movielink catalog.

Maybe there's another objective, but if so I don't see it. Instead I think the campaign ends up detracting from Movielink by confusing the user and not creating any really new distinctive value. Think about it - if you're a consumer that just bought the Ocean's Thirteen DVD, what new value is the download providing you? (Let me know if you can think of anything, I can't)

Movielink could have enhanced this campaign to greater effect in lots of different ways. Ideas: Open the download choice to anything in the catalog. Or make the download easily giftable to a friend to virally increase Movielink's awareness. Or create a rewards-style program that gives DVD purchasers credits toward subsequent downloads. And so on.